I've received the publishing contract from 47North. The terms are confidential (according to the terms--but is the confidentiality of the confidential terms itself a confidential term? I'm making myself dizzy here.). But, I can tell you that, as far as your typical contract of adhesion is concerned, the document is not the outrageously unreasonable document that one typically encounters. I am asking that the definition of one term be refined slightly and I think that my request will be accepted, then we sign, and I collect a sizable fraction of the advance.
Yee Haw!
And, to think, it was just in September that I was telling my wife, "Nah, there's no way that I could write fiction."
The Blogging home of H. Paul Honsinger, co-Author of the "Man of War" Military Science Fiction Trilogy.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Dick Deadeye Was Right
I had suspected this for some time, but it is now obvious—there
is a concerted effort on the part of someone, possibly a competing author, to “review
bomb” my books for the purpose of lowering their average customer rating.
The practice is fairly widespread and is common enough to
merit a write up in the New York Times not too long ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/business/a-casualty-on-the-battlefield-of-amazons-partisan-book-reviews.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Here’s what “review bombing” is, how it works, and why
someone would do it.
You see, over time, even the best book starts to slide down
the bestseller lists. Where a book gets
more durable exposure is on the “Best Rated” lists, where books are ranked by
some mysterious formula primarily based on the average “star” rating given to
books by customers. If a book is rated
high on these lists, it will get exposure for many, many months, maybe even
years, thereby providing the author with a steady stream of sales in the long
term.
Authors whose books are on these lists but who want a higher
ranking can obtain it fairly easily by getting five or six of their friends to
go online and to give “one star” reviews to the books with higher
rankings. Because of the mathematics of
averaging, it does not take many one star reviews to cause a meaningful decline
in a book’s rating.
Here’s an example.
Take my second book, For Honor We
Stand. It has an average customer
rating of 4.7 stars (it has been as high as 4.9). If some troll comes along and gives it a 1
star rating, I will need to receive 15 five star ratings before the average of
that one star rating and the subsequent 5 star ratings is equal to or higher
than the 4.7 I had before the 1 star rating was issued.
What makes me believe that this is going on? There is one rater who gave three star ratings
(Amazon is starting to look more closely at the one stars so if you give three
you are safe from having your review erased) to my first book and to several
other military science fiction novels on the same day, using the exact same
language: “It was an okay science
fiction story but not a whole lot of interesting ideas or plots. Maybe it's
aimed at a different target market.” Six
reviews. The same day. The same rating. The same words. Exactly.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Then, there’s the individual who trashes the first book in a
series, saying that you have to “look for the story line between the inane
drivel” and who then goes on to read and
review the second book so he can trash it, too! Do you
finish a book, tell the whole world that it contains “inane drivel” and
then spend $5.99 and a day or two of your life reading the sequel unless you
have something other than entertainment in mind? If you do, you need to find something more
interesting to do with your life. This
person clearly has an agenda. As if that
were bad enough, he suggests skipping the chapter that provides the foreshadowing
for the ending and comes right out and tells the despicable lie that neither
book contains any sub-plots. So, not
only is he basically committing a fraud on Amazon’s rating system, he’s a lying
piece of garbage, to boot.
There are other examples, but these are among the
worst. These people are doing damage to
the reputation and the sales of these books for no other reason than their
belief that, by tearing down my work, they can build up the work of someone
else by comparison. This is a despicable
and dishonest tactic. The people who do
it are not only the lowest form of contemptible slime, they are also guilty of Wire
Fraud, which is a federal felony prosecutable by the FBI under 18 U.S.C.
Section 1343.
Now, gang, I know that there are people who don’t like what
I write and that it is possible to hate every sentence I have ever set to paper
without any nefarious motives of any kind.
There are unfavorable reviews that I recognize are clearly those of
people who just don’t like my work. I’m
totally cool with that.
For example, here's one. The writer has legitimate reviews of lots of different kinds of books, many about science and scientific writing, and just doesn't like my book. I happen to disagree--for example, there is a gripe about the boarding cutlasses, something which I think I explain quite convincingly (should people be shooting bullets in a closed, pressurized metal tube in the vacuum of space, jammed with pressure vessels containing toxic gases and radioactive elements?). But reasonable people can disagree about such things. It is clear that the writer simply is not wild about the book. That's fine. It is a genuine opinion expressed for non-malicious reasons. THAT is what these reviews are for, not so that you can game them to push one product over another. http://www.amazon.com/review/R23F7AO4J2X85I/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
There are great works of literature that I can’t stand (can you say “Paradise Lost by John Milton” anyone?), and works of schlock that I adore (and, no, I won’t give you a title).
For example, here's one. The writer has legitimate reviews of lots of different kinds of books, many about science and scientific writing, and just doesn't like my book. I happen to disagree--for example, there is a gripe about the boarding cutlasses, something which I think I explain quite convincingly (should people be shooting bullets in a closed, pressurized metal tube in the vacuum of space, jammed with pressure vessels containing toxic gases and radioactive elements?). But reasonable people can disagree about such things. It is clear that the writer simply is not wild about the book. That's fine. It is a genuine opinion expressed for non-malicious reasons. THAT is what these reviews are for, not so that you can game them to push one product over another. http://www.amazon.com/review/R23F7AO4J2X85I/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
There are great works of literature that I can’t stand (can you say “Paradise Lost by John Milton” anyone?), and works of schlock that I adore (and, no, I won’t give you a title).
What these review bomging folks don’t seem to get is that this is a kind of
theft, and I don't mean theft as in stealing from Capitol Records by pirating a song. I mean like theft from a neighbor by stealing his pension check from his mailbox. I’m not a millionaire. I’ve enough in the bank to pay for a month of bills, maybe two. I have tens of thousands of dollars of unpaid medical bills from my heart bypass
surgery, and have a 17 year old daughter with braces I’m still paying for and
who will be going to college in about a year and a half. Writing is how I support my family (with the
help of my wife, who also writes and does well at it). This kind of attack is an attack on my
livelihood and on my family.
There’s not much that can be done about it. I report the abusive reviews to Amazon as “abuse”
but nothing has ever been done. I have
never even gotten any correspondence from Amazon regarding any of my reports,
some of which are many months old. The
only thing that you, readers and fans, can do is to write positive reviews if
you can do so in good conscience. As I
said earlier, it takes 15 reviews with 5 star ratings to put a book with a 4.7
average back where it was before getting a 1 star rating. With a 2 star review, it takes 14 reviews
giving 5 stars to do the same. The
mathematics is relentless, which is why people do this—it works.
Notwithstanding these attacks, sales are still pretty good
on both books. There are so many good
reviews with so many people who say so many good things so articulately and so
persuasively that, if someone who is interested in this kind of book takes a
look, that reader is very likely to buy the book. But, this is not the point where the low
reviews hurt; rather, it is in lowering the books’ visibility on the “Top Rated”
lists and reducing the number of people who take a good look at the books in
the first place.
As Dick Deadeye says in HMS
Pinafore, “it’s a rum world.”
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Twitter? I guess so.
I've caved in to the overwhelming social and media pressure to start tweeting. Whether I will have anything worthy to say in 140 characters or less and whether anyone will want to read those same 140 characters remains to be seen. But, let it not be said that I am doing what I am supposed to do to promote myself, particularly now that I've actually received the contract from 47North and will be actually signing within the next few days.
You can follow me at: https://twitter.com/HPaulHonsinger
I'll try to make it fun.
You can follow me at: https://twitter.com/HPaulHonsinger
I'll try to make it fun.
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Terms Agreed To--Contract Next Week
I have come to agreement with 47North Publications on the terms of a publishing contract with them. I expect to have draft contracts to review, comment upon, and sign sometime next week. The exact terms of the deal are, naturally, confidential. I can assure you, however, that so far I feel that I am being treated very fairly and being given the impression that my work and I are valuable commodities.
All this stuff has been a tremendous distraction for the past few weeks and I haven't gotten much writing done. I'm hoping that when I get the contracts signed, things will be back to business as usual and I can get back to what my new life as an author is all about: writing. Speaking of which, I have pretty much trashed what I have done so far on the first chapter and decided to do something totally different. I'm excited about the new approach. It's different from how I started the other two books and I do believe it will help the new book get off to a real roaring start.
All this stuff has been a tremendous distraction for the past few weeks and I haven't gotten much writing done. I'm hoping that when I get the contracts signed, things will be back to business as usual and I can get back to what my new life as an author is all about: writing. Speaking of which, I have pretty much trashed what I have done so far on the first chapter and decided to do something totally different. I'm excited about the new approach. It's different from how I started the other two books and I do believe it will help the new book get off to a real roaring start.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)